Category: News And Announcements

As part of SJI’s ongoing commitment to support court access to federal grant funds, we are pleased to announce that 16 courts have been selected to participate in an intensive federal grant application development series.  This series is sponsored by SJI in collaboration with Rulo Strategies.  The virtual training series will integrate traditional grant training and technical assistance (TTA) with intensive, one on-one support to assist selected sites in the development of a federal application for the FY 2021 grant season.  Courts from the following states/territories will be participating in this initiative:

Arizona

Delaware

Georgia

Hawaii

New Hampshire

New Jersey

Ohio

Pennsylvania

Tennessee

Wisconsin

Congratulations to these courts on their selection!  If you missed the deadline to apply, but are interested in this grant training, some of the course materials will be made available on the SJI Funding Toolkit in mid-November.  Stay tuned for additional details.

The State Justice Institute (SJI) is seeking to fund projects that assist state courts in their response to, and recovery from, COVID-19, with a look towards the future of court operations. In addition to meeting all other application requirements, SJI will give priority consideration for funding to projects that focus on institutionalizing and/or replicating practices that were implemented during the pandemic. Read the formal solicitation here.

Applications for this opportunity must be submitted via the SJI Grant Management System (GMS). Applications will be reviewed, and if approved, awarded on a rolling basis in FY 2021. Visit the Virtual Learning section of the Funding Toolkit for State Courts and Justice System Partners to learn more about SJI funding, including a podcast about this funding opportunity. Email contact@sji.gov with questions regarding this solicitation.

Special Note on Prohibited Costs for this Solicitation:

No grant funds or cash match may be used to pay the salary and related costs for a current or new employee of a court or other unit of government because such funds would constitute supplanting state or local funds in violation of 42 U.S.C. 10706(d)(1); this includes new employees hired specifically for the project. Grant funds cannot be used for the purpose of purchasing software and/or equipment, such as software and/or equipment for conducting remote hearings, as these are considered basic court operations.

Despite presenting challenges to numerous court processes, the pandemic also afforded opportunities for courts to implement innovations that are making family courts more accessible, efficient, high priority – and less adversarial.  The innovations are part of the Conference of Chief Justices/Conference of State Court Administrators Family Justice Initiative (FJI), which is celebrating many milestones:

• Passage of a CCJ/COSCA resolution that supports FJI’s “bold, national recommendations”
• Release ofan online report that serves as a repository for courts that have effectively responded the needs of families before, during, and after the pandemic
• The launch ofredesigned web pages that provide guidelines, recommendations, and best practices

FJI, established in 2017 with funding from SJI, is supported by the National Center for State Courts (NCSC), the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System (IAALS), and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ).

The project’s first phase included a national assessment of domestic relations case processing in urban courts.  Phase two included the development of national Principles for Family Justice Reform.  Following CCJ’s approval of the Principles, project partners launched Phase Three to implement the Principles in four pilot jurisdictions: Miami-Dade, Florida; Cuyahoga County, Ohio; Pima County, Arizona; and King County, Washington.

Soon after the pilot sites began improvement efforts, the COVID-19 pandemic hit.  The four sites met virtually in June 2020 to share progress and reevaluate needs as a result of the pandemic.  Some of the “silver linings” the sites identified include: improved communication with parties as court staff walked parties through the processes remotely; improved scheduling options, giving parties autonomy to schedule their hearings online; and increased use of remote proceedings that resulted in improved appearance rates and party satisfaction.  Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Marion County, Indiana have since joined the FJI implementation efforts.

The FJI team – taking into consideration adaptations courts made as a result of the pandemic –identified supplemental recommendations, which CCJ and COSCA endorsed in Resolution 4 in July.  The new recommendations include:

• Affording family cases the same prestige and respect as other court matters
• Aggressively triaging cases as early as possible
• Simplifying court procedures to allow self-represented litigants to engage in the justice system and are treated fairly
• Ensuring that self-help information and services are available both in person and remotely
• Offering families a choice of dispute resolution options
• Promoting the well-being of families through the life of their case as the primary desired case outcome

Alaska Chief Justice Joel Bolger, FJI chair, said he hopes this resolution “will help family courts respond to the common barriers presented by high caseloads, limited staffing, complex procedures, and narrow service options, and increased numbers of self-represented litigants. The COVID-19 pandemic brings new urgency around the need for family courts to implement positive adaptations and support continuous innovation.”

“We all recognize the strains brought on by the pandemic,” said Alicia Davis, FJI project manager and NCSC principal court consultant. “It is encouraging to see how these courts and others are redesigning processes to meet the needs of families.”

SJI recently released the Grant Guideline for FY 2021.  The Grant Guideline appears as part of the National Archives and Records Administration’s Federal Register, and sets forth the administrative, programmatic, and financial requirements for applying for and administering SJI grants.

Fiscal Year 2021 Deadlines for Project, Technical Assistance, and Curriculum Adaptation Grants are as follows:

• 1st Quarter – November 1, 2020
• 2nd Quarter – February 1, 2021
• 3rd Quarter – May 1, 2021
• 4th Quarter – August 1, 2021

On October 1, 2020, the State Justice Institute (SJI) launched the Grant Management System (GMS) to better serve applicants and grantees, and further improve the grant-making process.  The GMS is an online, end-to-end system, that spans the entire grant lifecycle.  The GMS provides applicants and grantees with the ability to apply for and manage grants, including fulfilling reporting requirements and requesting reimbursement of grant-funded activities.

Beginning in FY 2021, all new grant applications submissions must be submitted through the GMS.  Additionally, all grantees from FY 2021 forward are required to manage their awards in the GMS.  Grantees with open awards made prior to FY 2021, may elect to create a new account and complete all requirements in GMS.  While not required, current grantees are encouraged to utilize the new system.  

The launch of GMS represents a considerable investment by SJI, and reinforces our commitment to improving the grant application and management process, and advancing the use of technology by state courts.  Users may access GMS at gms.sji.gov to create an account and begin new applications, or manage current grant awards.  SJI staff are available to answer questions and  provide support, and can be reached at contact@sji.gov.  A series of brief videos are also available for GMS users.  Additional resources include a Grant Application Guide and a Grant Management Guide.

The coronavirus pandemic has led to inconvenience, unprecedented case backlogs and issues that the nation’s state courts haven’t faced since the influenza pandemic of 1918-19. It has also led to opportunity.

The Conference of Chief Justices (CCJ) and Conference of State Court Administrators (COSCA) urge state court officials to view the pandemic with a glass-half-full perspective, and they recommend that state courts consider six principles related to their use of technology going forward.

“The COVID-19 pandemic is not the disruption courts wanted, but it is the disruption that courts needed to re-imagine and embrace new ways of operating and to transform courts into a more accessible, transparent, efficient, and user-friendly branch of government,” CCJ and COSCA’s RRT Technology workgroup wrote in a recently released resource paper.

Here are the six principles, and some steps court officials can take to implement them:

• Ensure principles of due process, procedural fairness, transparency, and equal access are satisfied when adopting new technologies. Make sure litigants receive proper notice of hearings. Use plain language to present legal information. Design systems that connect litigants with legal help. Review online dispute resolution agreements prior to hearings.
• Focus on the user experience. Make it easier for people to use court services by expanding online opportunities and communication channels with users, including under-served communities and people who are less than proficient in English.
• Prioritize court-user driven technology. Identify problems in order to select the best technological solutions and get input from all stakeholders, including lawyers and litigants.
• Embrace flexibility and willingness to adapt. Test and adapt, try and fail, and move on from technology that isn’t solving problems. Start with a viable product that doesn’t impact fundamental due process. Examine and re-examine the product. Be open to public-private partnerships to refine it.
• Adopt remote-first (or at least remote-friendly) planning, where practicable, to move court processes forward. Move as many court processes as possible online. Allow for remote attendance at hearings using telephone or video. Ensure that staffers and users have the training and resources they need to participate. Figure out how to involve users with no or limited access to the internet.
• Take an open, data-driven, and transparent approach to implementing and maintaining court processes and supporting technologies. Collect data at frequent intervals and ensure it helps court leaders accurately assess the technology’s impact. Protect personal identifying information.

Technology has played a critical role in the courts’ response to the pandemic.  As courts begin to resume some in-person proceedings and to consider a post-pandemic world, courts must not leave the technological advances behind, but instead use these guiding principles to build upon the success of the past months to better serve court users and provide greater equal access to justice for all.

The SJI Board of Directors met virtually on August 31, 2020 to make decisions on quarterly grant applications, and approved a total of 15 new grants. 

Ten (10) Strategic Initiatives Grants were approved in support of SJI’s Pandemic Response and Recovery Request for Applications (RFA).  More information about these innovative projects will be released soon.  SJI received over $4.8 million in applications for the RFA in the first round.  SJI is now accepting applications on a rolling basis.  Potential applicants are encouraged to closely review the requirements.  Visit the Virtual Learning section of the Funding Toolkit for State Courts and Justice System Partners to learn more about SJI funding, including a podcast about this funding opportunity. Email contact@sji.gov with questions regarding this solicitation.

Five (5) Technical Assistance Grants were approved: the Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts to develop and implement a pilot Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) platform to resolve medical debt disputes in Hamilton County; the Iowa Judicial Branch to implement a landlord/tenant ODR pilot in Story County; the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) to provide technical assistance to several jurisdictions that will assess the quality of master jury lists, including inclusiveness, representativeness, and record accuracy; the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts to provide a specialized online orientation video for the Custody and Visitation Mediation Program in both English and Spanish; and the New Hampshire Supreme Court for the redevelopment and design overhaul of the Judiciary’s website. 

The next deadline for grant applications is November 1, 2020 (FY 2021, 1^st Quarter). 

January 2020 marked the start of the Oregon Judicial Department’s two-year Strategic Campaign, developed with SJI support and technical assistance provided by the National Center for State Courts (NCSC).

This new approach, recommended by the NCSC and focused on identifying short-term, achievable goals – appealed to Chief Justice Martha L. Walters and State Court Administrator Nancy J. Cozine.  The campaign, as opposed to a longer-term strategic plan, spans 2020-2021 and employs a more flexible and open-ended methodology to mobilize judges, court staff, and justice partners in the development of vital improvement themes and initiatives.  This revised approach reflects the reality that courts often need to pivot quickly in the changing landscapes of social welfare, budget challenges, and local and national policy priorities.

To develop the campaign, the Judiciary engaged in a four-month process of gathering stakeholder input, starting with the creation of a Strategic Campaign Advisory Committee, comprised of judges and administrators from across this state.  Working with consultants, the committee developed an engagement and outreach plan to learn where the Judiciary should focus its efforts in the coming years.  This resulted in numerous focus groups and outreach meetings with a variety of stakeholders – judges, staff, public defenders, prosecutors, family law attorneys, legal aid leaders, civil practitioners, businesses, state and local government agencies, Bar leadership, and others.  The feedback was then presented and discussed at a two-day summit where more than 40 judges and administrators considered where the Judiciary should focus its energy and resources over the next two years.

Four key themes emerged, which became commitments to the people of Oregon, and all who encounter the state justice system:

1. We will join with community partners to improve services and outcomes for people who are underserved, vulnerable, or marginalized; and we will develop effective, supportive, and creative solutions to respond to their legal needs.
2. We will improve access to justice by eliminating barriers; continuing to simplify and streamline our processes and forms; enhancing service options; leveraging technology; improving interpreter services; and advocating for resources to keep courts open, safe, and secure.
3. We will enhance the public’s trust and confidence in Oregon’s state government, including the judicial branch, by listening and responding to the needs of those we serve; holding ourselves to high standards; and communicating the role of our courts in providing justice for all.
4. We will create a workplace and courthouse culture that is supportive, inclusive, welcoming, and affirming; that embraces diversity; and where all people can thrive and are treated with respect and dignity.

Each of these commitments is supported by several initiatives designed to carry the goals forward, led by judges and administrators from all over the state.  “We face many challenges in our constant effort to provide justice for all Oregonians,” said Chief Justice Walters.  “It is my hope that, by undertaking specific commitments and initiatives, we can better address those challenges, increase public trust and confidence in our courts, and improve our services for all.”

This two-year campaign approach proved to be the correct course as Oregon’s judicial branch soon found itself facing unapparelled circumstances in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, rising social and economic disparity, and the renewed demands for justice.  This required some retooling of these initiatives and, fortunately, the campaign structure allowed for needed modifications.

While some of the initiatives may take more time, as new budget challenges and cuts to programs loom on the horizon, nearly all have been launched, finding renewed purpose in this time of change.  For example, the initiative team to advance fairness in the imposition and collection of court fines and fees sprang into action, providing immediate relief from collections for those who found themselves suffering from economic hardship during the pandemic.  The Judiciary’s efforts to emphasize diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging in the court system led to the rapid development of staff conversations and trainings during the pandemic.  The increased demand for remote hearings brought new focus on building technological tools, accessible forms, and best practices for court participation from remote locations.

For questions about this project, or to learn more, please contact Erin M. Pettigrew, Access to Justice Counsel, at Erin.M.Pettigrew@ojd.state.or.us.

The National Juvenile Defender Center (NJDC) is pleased to announce the release of its most recent assessment, Undervalued: An Assessment of Access to and Quality of Juvenile Defense Counsel in New Hampshire.  It is a thorough examination of New Hampshire’s juvenile defense delivery system. 

The report was featured in New Hampshire’s largest paper, the Union Leader, and represents the culmination of an 18-month process of research, site visits, data analysis, writing, editing, and stakeholder outreach.

The assessment found that an absence of dedicated juvenile defense practitioners in New Hampshire leads to many youth waiving their rights and facing long-term consequences.  Nearly every aspect of the defense system is set up to devalue juvenile delinquency cases, often leading to youth receiving constitutionally deficient counsel.

This report is the 26th state assessment NJDC has released.  Every previous NJDC assessment report has spurred reforms in states juvenile defense systems.  The NJDC encourages the New Hampshire Judiciary to consider:

• Implementing a strong, well-resourced, specialized system of juvenile defense.
• Establishing and supporting juvenile defense leadership and requiring specialization in juvenile defense.
• Establishing state standards for juvenile defense attorney qualifications and performance.
• Automatically appointing counsel for all youth prior to their first court appearance and ensuring youth are represented throughout their involvement in the juvenile legal system.

All NJDC’s state assessments can be found online.

The National Center for State Courts, in partnership with Rulo Strategies, is launching a Rural Justice Collaborative (RJC). The RJC is seeking nominations for Advisory Committee members, as well as for cross-sector programs or initiatives based in rural communities that involve courts and stakeholders in the justice, child welfare, and behavioral health systems.