Judicial Task Force Releases Final Report on State Courts’ Response to Mental Illness

Funded by State Justice Insititute, the Judicial Task Force releases the final report from the National Judicial Task Force to Examine State Courts’ Response to Mental Illness. Continued collaboration between the courts, government agencies, mental health providers and others is critical to affect the systemic change needed to improve how courts respond to individuals with serious mental illness. That was the message echoed during Tuesday’s release of the final report from the National Judicial Task Force to Examine State Courts’ Response to Mental Illness. The virtual event drew about 900 participants, including court officials, behavioral health professionals, and members of the news media.

“We see how the justice system can become a never-ending highway of pain as it maneuvers people on a needless journey, with no off ramp, often to ineffective support and treatment,” said task force member Circuit Judge Nan Waller of Multnomah County, Oregon. “However, having had the privilege to serve on the task force has given me great optimism. The task force operated in a manner consistent with its recommendations, bringing together stakeholders from the behavioral health and justice systems, along with the important voices of those with lived experience, and then providing expert staff to help turn our thoughts and ideas into tools, bench cards, policy briefs, and research.”

Judge Waller joined task force co-chairs Chief Justice Paul L. Reiber of Vermont and New York Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence K. Marks to offer insights on ways the task force recommendations can positively impact individuals with severe mental illness during Tuesday’s virtual launch and policy discussion.

Two national mental health experts – Miriam E. Delphin-Rittmon, Ph.D., the U.S. Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use and leader of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and Dr. Sarah Y. Vinson, Interim Chair of the Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences at Morehouse School of Medicine – elaborated on ways the behavioral health community can partner with the courts to improve outcomes for individuals with serious mental illness.

“We know that our country is facing a mental health crisis,” Dr. Delphin-Rittmon said. “… I am confident that these recommendations and examples of successful programs have the potential to make really meaningful impacts in communities across the country.”

Among the task force recommendations, state courts should:

  • Convene justice and behavioral health system partners to identify opportunities to collaboratively improve responses to individuals with behavioral health disorders.
  • Promote processes to identify and divert individuals with behavioral health disorders at every stage of system involvement towards treatment and away from further penetration into the criminal justice system.
  • Examine current case management and calendaring practices and implement strategies to more quickly and effectively address issues presented in cases involving individuals with behavioral health needs.

Watch the recording of the webinar and download a copy of the final report and recommendations.

New Toolkit Provides Guidance for Adopting Pandemic Era Procedural Improvements

During the pandemic, courts stepped out of their normal routine and comfort zones to find new ways of doing business. These new procedures benefitted both courts and court customers. The National Center for State Courts (NCSC)’s new Pandemic Era Procedural Improvements toolkit outlines tips and examples that your court can adopt to enhance operations in the post-pandemic era.

“The pandemic was a major disruptor. I think about other major disruptors that changed society—cars, TV, mobile phones. We didn’t stop at the Benz Patent Motor Car, black and white television, or car phones,” said Lonni Summers, an NCSC senior court management consultant. “We continued to innovate and evolve to make things better. Courts should do the same with pandemic-era procedural improvements.”

This toolkit contains a high-level summary of procedural improvements that courts implemented between 2020 and 2022 that courts should adopt permanently. Resources include examples, best practice recommendations, and references to publications and materials that provide information, models, and guidance for jurisdictions that want to adopt these improvements.

For more information, please read Pandemic-Improvements-10.31.2022.pdf (ncsc.org)

Upcoming Webinar! Black Robes and White Coats: Using Project ECHO to Increase Judiciary Knowledge about Substance Use Disorder

Upcoming Webinar! Hosted by SAMHSA’s GAINS Center on Monday, November 21st, 2022, from 2:30-4:00PM EST. Black Robes and White Coats: Using Project ECHO to Increase Judiciary Knowledge about Substance Use Disorder. High rates of substance use and overdoses among people interfacing with the criminal justice system have highlighted a need for judges to be more informed and aware of substance use disorders and optimal treatment approaches. Register here.

IAALS Launches New Report and Online Resource Center for Unbundled Legal Services, Offering New Tools that Lead to Access to Justice

IAALS, the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System at the University of Denver, released Unbundled Legal Services in the New Normal—a new report highlighting key takeaways from the national 2021 conference—in partnership with The Chicago Bar Foundation, the ABA Standing Committee on the Delivery of Legal Services, and the Self-Represented Litigation Network. Accompanying the release is the launch of an unbundling resource center on IAALS’ website, which will help various stakeholders like consumers, lawyers, and courts get how-to information on promoting and utilizing unbundled legal services. 

Unbundled legal services, or limited-scope representation, is one way that people who are unable to afford a lawyer—and would end up representing themselves in court—can still receive legal assistance in their case. While typically lawyers handle all aspects of a case from beginning to end, a lawyer providing unbundled legal services works on and charges for only certain legal tasks within the broader case, often based on what their clients can afford and need help with most. Unbundled legal services are becoming a more popular and less expensive way to help people get legal assistance, which usually leads to better legal outcomes than forgoing legal assistance altogether.

The three-day event highlighted that while there is increased use of technology and scalable unbundled services in this “new normal”—which makes starting an unbundled practice easier—important startup and ethical considerations remain for practitioners in this space, in addition to needed increased support by courts. The conference created a forum where an array of stakeholders shared their perspectives, gained better insights into collaborative roles, and learned about best practices to advocate for this service delivery model.

To read the full report, visit: IAALS Launches New Report and Online Resource Center for Unbundled Legal Services, Offering New Tools that Lead to Access to Justice | IAALS (du.edu)

Court Manager Magazine: Summer 2022 Edition Now Available

The National Association for Court Management (NACM) Summer 2022 edition of the Court Manager magazine is now available.

This edition features all things Annual Conference – a recap of sessions, social events, awards, CORE® sessions and the CORE® Champion Program, and a testimonial of the conference scholarship benefits. In addition, regular columns on Courtside Conversations, Management Musings, and a Question of Ethics.

Read more here

Webinar: Disarming Disinformation: How Courts Can Respond

Learn guidelines and steps courts can take to combat disinformation – before an incident develops – in this second installment in our disinformation series. We’ll discuss the work of Arizona’s Task Force on Countering Disinformation and a recently adopted resolution from the Conference of Chief Justices and Conference of State Court Administrators. We’ll also hear from an industry expert with deep knowledge of national security and disinformation and learn about NCSC’s “Combating Disinformation” playbook for courts.

Thursday, October 6th 3:00 PM ET.

Moderator:

  • Marcia Meis | Director, Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts

Panelists:

  • Preston Golson | Director, Brunswick Group, Washington, D.C.
  • Aaron Nash | Director, Certification & Licensing Division, Arizona Supreme Court

Register here

Low-Cost Ways to Increase Court Appearances

Thursday, September 29th. 4:00-5:00 PM ET.

During this webinar, hear experts discuss why appearance rates matter, low-cost interventions courts can implement to improve appearance rates, and what broad-scale reform to improve court appearance rates can look like. NCSC will also convene interested judges, court administrators, and practitioners from around the country to share their experiences and brainstorm new ways to help court users overcome barriers to accessing court.

Moderator:

  • Shelly Cern | Principal Court Management Consultant, National Center for State Courts

Panelists:

  • Alissa Fishbane | Managing Director, ideas42
  • Pamerson Ifill |  Deputy Commissioner of Pretrial, State of Massachusetts
  • Martha Wright | Judicial Council of California
  • Judge Milas “Butch” Hale | District Court of Arkansas, Sherwood 

Register here

Upcoming Webinars from the National Immigrant Women’s Advocacy Project

NIWAP Upcoming Webinars

  1. Webinar: Naturalization of VAWA, SIJS, U, and T Visa Recipient Survivors: TTA from USCIS and NIWAP (September 23, 2022)
  2. Webinar: New Regulation Policies and Court Rulings’ Impact on State Courts Issuing Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) Orders (October 4, 2022)
  3. Webinar: What Judges, Attorneys, and Prosecutors Need to Know About How VAWA Confidentiality Impacts Discovery in Cases Involving Immigrant Survivors (October 14, 2022)

Naturalization of VAWA, SIJS, U, and T Visa Recipient Survivors: TTA from USCIS and NIWAP

 Friday, September 23, 2022, 12:00-1:30 pm EST

Description

This webinar will provide participants with an overview of the naturalization process of VAWA, SIJS, U, and T visa recipients.  U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will discuss their work to remove barriers to citizenship and promote naturalization under  Executive Order 14012 and the Interagency Strategy for Promoting Naturalization, as well as review the naturalization application process and address the particular circumstances, needs, and concerns of lawful permanent residents who were VAWA self-petitioners, T and U visa holders, and Special Immigrant Juveniles.

Information regarding the training and technical assistance NIWAP can provide on immigrant survivors’ naturalization, and other Training and Technical Assistance (TTA) immigration matters will also be shared during the webinar.

Faculty

  1. Leslye E. Orloff,  Director,NIWAP, American University, Washington College of Law
  2. Kelly Ryan,  USCIS, Senior Advisor USCIS
  3. Mary Flores,  USCIS, Chief of Citizenship Education Branch
  4. Colleen Zengotitabengoa,  Chief of the Refugee and Asylum Law Division in the USCIS Office of Chief Counsel
  5. Edna Yang, Co-Executive Director, American Gateways

Target Audience

This FREE webinar is designed for victim advocates, attorneys, and law enforcement, prosecutors, judges, OVW grantees, other victim service providers who would like up-to-date information on how NIWAP can support their work, as well as how to aid noncitizen survivors in attaining naturalization.

New Regulation Policies and Court Rulings’ Impact on State Courts Issuing Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) Orders

 Tuesday, October 4, 2022, 3:00-4:00 PM EST

Description

In 2022, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services issued new Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) regulations and policy guidance (March 2022) and an updated SIJS policy manual (May 2022).  In August 2022 the California Supreme Court issued a ruling In Re Guardianship of Saul H. that provides helpful direction to state courts issuing SIJS predicate orders. 

This webinar will provide updates, answer questions, and describe the impact of these new regulations, policies, and court rulings for state juvenile and family court judges issuing predicate orders that SIJS eligible children need to file for SIJS immigration relief.

Faculty will provide practice tips for judges and lawyers in addition to discussing best practices for drafting state court orders.  Faculty will also describe the impact these new policies and rulings have for state court practice in SIJ S cases and how these policies benefit the vulnerable immigrant children seeking help from state courts and through SIJS immigration protections. 

Faculty 

  1. David B. Thronson,  Director, Talsky Center for Human Rights of Women and Children, Michigan State University College of Law
  2. Hon. Victor Reyes (Ret.), Judge-In-Residence, National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ)
  3. Leslye E. Orloff, Director, National Immigrant Women’s Advocacy Project (NIWAP), Washington College of Law

Target Audience 

This webinar is designed for state court judges and the attorneys who represent immigrant children seeking SIJS orders from state family and juvenile courts.

What Judges, Attorneys, and Prosecutors Need to Know About How VAWA Confidentiality Impacts Discovery in Cases Involving Immigrant Survivors

Friday, October 14, 2022, 1:00-2:30 pm EST

Description
Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) confidentiality offers federal immigration law protections enacted to prevent perpetrators from learning about, interfering with, and obtaining information contained in survivors’ victim-based applications for immigration relief (VAWA, Battered Spouse Waiver, U and T visa cases). The faculty (judge, former prosecutor, family lawyer) will discuss how courts, prosecutors and attorneys should respond when offenders seek discovery of VAWA confidentiality protected information in criminal, family, and civil court cases. Best practices for anticipating, preparing for, and addressing VAWA confidentiality discovery issues in a manner that promotes and protects victim safety and offender accountability will be highlighted.  Attendees will receive up-to-date VAWA confidentiality case law; DHS policies, and practice pointers.

Faculty

  1. Hon. Mary Weir, Jackson County, Missouri, Associate Circuit Judge
  2. Jane Anderson, Attorney Advisor, AEquitas
  3. Leslye Orloff, Director, NIWAP

Target Audience

This webinar is designed for judges, prosecutors, victims’ family and civil lawyers, victim advocates, and OVW grantees. 

E-filing Domestic Violence Protection Orders—Safety, Accessibility, and Effectiveness

This webinar will review key considerations identified through NCSC’s critical conversations with court stakeholders across the country related to portals and e-filing systems for domestic violence cases, such as addressing safety and confidentiality/privacy concerns, challenges to accessibility, support strategies to help petitioners navigate technology, and court processes and collaborations necessary to build a robust framework.

1:30 p.m. ET on Tuesday, September 27

As a result of this program, participants will be better able to:

  • Explain the benefits and challenges, especially for users, of e-filing systems for domestic violence protection orders
  • Identify the specific obstacles and strategies to overcome them, regarding user safety, confidentiality/privacy, and accessibility of e-filing systems
  • Describe the challenges petitioners face in navigating the e-filing process and how to address them by providing necessary support through access to advocates and other strategies
  • Effectively collaborate with key stakeholders to develop, implement, and assess the effectiveness of e-filing systems

Facilitators:

  • Alicia Davis | Principal Court Management Consultant, National Center for State Courts
  • Kathryn Genthon | Senior Court Research Associate, National Center for State Courts

Panelists:

  • Darren Mitchell | Consultant, National Center for State Courts
  • Ayyoub Ajmi | Director of Technology at University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law; Founder CiviLaw.Tech
  • Staci Pratt | Head of Student Services and Outreach, Assistant Professor of Teaching, William A. Wise Law Library, University of Colorado Law School, Boulder
  • Kay Radwanski | Senior Court Policy Analyst, Arizona Administrative Office of the Courts

Register here

Today’s Disinformation Threats

Disinformation and misinformation campaigns undermine public confidence in our country’s institutions, including courts. These campaigns can cause a crisis of confidence that can affect the ability of courts to do their duty and potentially harm the people who depend on court services. We will kick off a two-part webinar series by exploring “Today’s Disinformation Threats.” Featuring nationally recognized subject-matter experts, this webinar will highlight the current disinformation landscape, forecast disinformation trends on the horizon, and detail why courts should be concerned.

3 p.m. ET on Thursday, September 22

Moderator:
• Anna Blackburne-Rigsby | Chief Judge of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals


Panelists:
• Jennifer Rubin | Opinion Columnist Covering Policy and Politics, Washington Post
• Suzanne Spaulding | Senior Adviser for Homeland Security and Director of the Defending Democratic Institutions Project, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)

Register here